哈姆雷特读后感英文作文
【简介】感谢网友“小绿机器侠”参与投稿，以下是小编为大家整理的哈姆雷特读后感英文作文（共15篇），仅供参考，欢迎大家阅读。
篇1：《哈姆雷特》英文读后感
《哈姆雷特》英文读后感
Shakspere (wrong spelling) created Hamlet--a man with wisdom and courage .In order to revenge on his uncle for killing his father, he pretented (spelling mistake) to be mad and suffered a series of misery. On the contrary, we can also say that Hamlet is rude and selfish for he did not think twice before his revenge . if (Capitalize “If” since it is the beginning word of the sentence.) a country has no king, how can a country keep alive (You need a question mark here since it is a question.) So, every thing has two sides, the bright side and adumbral side. Every time we make a decision we have to think twice.
Comment:
Be careful with your spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Too many uncessary mistakes.
It is good that you looked at both the dark and bright sides of Hamlet. Thats quite objective and convincing.
篇2：哈姆雷特英文读后感
Prince Hamlet - the tragedy character of Shakespeare
“To be, or not to be, that is the question”。 But after answering this question, what comes next? To be in what kind of ways may bring you the value of life? And is the value precious enough for you to continue living? These are questions that can never be solved. Hamlet chose to live, in order to revenge the tragic death of his honest father, the Danish king. On account of Hamlet was so kind, he missed the best chance of killing his uncle, the murderer of his father. The uncle, who was the new king, devised several plans to kill Hamlet, indirectly killed Hamlet’s beloved Ophelia、Ophelia’s brother and father, and Hamlet’s mother, the new queen who was married to his uncle. These tragedies finally forced Hamlet to make his decision, and stabbed the sword of revenge to his uncle. Unfortunately, Hamlet was already hurt by a sword with poison on it and would be dead quickly at the moment. It was the kindness and hesitation made him fail. For his father, died while having a grasping dream and went to hell for that. Hamlet didn’t kill his uncle while he was praying because if he killed him at that time, he would have gone to heaven. Hamlet didn’t want to return good for evil, this irresolute nature caused the failure of his revenge. But why would god send a person to heaven or hell only considering what he’s thinking about at the last moment of life? Is that really fair? There is no doubt that Hamlet lived in a period of time that everybody was “crazy” and everybody except Hamlet was unaware of the truth. Hamlet even had to fake madness to prevent others from having suspicion. So why being sober when everybody else is drunk? Why being normal when everybody else is mad? It’s to keep your soul clear from being stained, it’s to stop cheating yourself when the truth is already out. It’s worthwhile to die for bringing out the truth, cause living with the concealed truth is worse than dying, especially when the truth that everyone should see is buried with your own hands. “To die - to sleep! But in that sleep of death what dreams may come”， who knows? The heaven loss of life in the play brought us shock, and in a short while, kept us from making the same mistake. But even this does not last too long. Time flies, but even flying time can not stop us from making the tragedy happens again and again. Instead, time took the sadness and regret away, weakened the memory. No more left but the sad touching story and the melody from fair Ophelia when she drowned in running stream. It’s not just a play, it’s something that is happening on the earth every moment. People never learn, soon the laughter and cheers may replace the lamentation, like the newborn roses covered the dead branches in spring. It’s the law of nature, living people continue living, death brings several days of weeping, but what remains? Nothing but dust and soil. This happened before, it’s happening now, but in the future （we hope） this shall never happen again.
篇3：哈姆雷特读后感英文
Created in 1600 ―― 1601 Hamlet had been admired for centuries. Is to at the moment, still feel his vocal. And all this is not the plot, also not only only is excellent literary technique, it is reflected by the problem. In general,
It describes a kind of extremely primitive, people.
The hero Hamlet first dealing with your original ideal world. At the start of the benefits in some Hamlet “childhood”, he did you experience any huge setback, living environment is more simple, always learning western orthodoxy. But in the end, noble, to adore the father died, less than a month is virtuous mother remarried his uncle to usurp the throne. This made him wonder in the world. And after this doubt directly contributed to his hesitation. He realized that they are not perfect it, chastity but desire, moral victory over greed. He thinks you should go to revenge, but the moral person is his mother; His uncle killed his father and he is a person, is a person's thoughts. But even if revenge success, again how? He said: “to be or not to be, this is a question worth thinking about” life is a pain, but the fear of death and have less absolute. He met a problem, can't answer is unavoidable.
Hamlet's situation is not the only, the life of big hands to hold each one is so tight.()
The old king's death, which are not related and queen. But as a woman she faces two kinds of selection, it is moral or desire. She chose the latter. However she scorned by the Hamlet and criticism, moral emptiness has brought her considerable pain, in fact, the queen is a kind person, she is not morally repugnant. She is to choose what kind of misfortune, not in the selection of your own destiny.
The new king, the uncle usurped the throne, he is the biggest villain in the play leading role. He wanted to the throne, and to the queen with desire. But the king was others. Is his brother, he don't deserve the throne. He, like all of the faces the loss of the ideal world in my heart. But he strenuously to win, but at the moment, he was a hero general spirit, he bravely to fight for originally do not belong to own. But it is also the tragedy. He paid the price, his hands stained with the blood of others, cannot repent. In later, he found Hamlet after knowing the truth, he began to save themselves may lose the happiness of life. He hovered between sin and rational, in the end he didn't jump out, died in his own sword.
Le for, and the fate of me Mr Li chardonnay with Hamlet striking similarities. In selection of to be or not to be, I am Mr Li xia chose the latter, she chose to suicide. In the selection of revenge or not, le for Hamlet is completely opposite the avengers, “so am I a noble father die in vain, so a good younger sister just this go crazy?… my revenge chance will come one day.” In revenge and “inevitable” death on this matter, all of the selected point to the same destination.
Unlike Hamlet's stagnant, others struggle for action. New killed the old king, the king and tried to confess to clear their iniquity, and to attempt to kill Hamlet through to keep the throne. Le for and implement the plan together, in an attempt to let Hamlet to pay for his father's death. But in the end? The new king was dead, he might say the revenge. Le for dead, plan to fail. Hamlet died on the others for his revenge. ……
Someone said that the story of Hamlet is too far-fetched, how could all die. But that is precisely the reality. The article shows a group of people who fight against the fate to us of the final end. They try to change your fate, as a result, what also have no save. They try to restore the past, what the result. This kind of helpless, depends on each person, perhaps the biggest misfortune is man himself. “Hamlet” type of glass with each and every one, every aspect, and all the time.
Such thing as fate is a kind of existence, how he would like a shadow, and we was like peas and carrots, like sunshine and warm the heart, but more often, deep and terrible like a nightmare. “The will of god dominate everything”, this sentence, there is no doubt quite penetrating.
篇4：哈姆雷特读后感英文
“To be, or not to be, that is the question”。 But after answering this question, what comes next? To be in what kind of ways may bring you the value of life? And is the value precious enough for you to continue living? These are questions that can never be solved. Hamlet chose to live, in order to revenge the tragic death of his honest father, the Danish king. On account of Hamlet was so kind, he missed the best chance of killing his uncle, the murderer of his father. The uncle, who was the new king, devised several plans to kill Hamlet, indirectly killed Hamlet’s beloved Ophelia 、Ophelia’s brother and father, and Hamlet’s mother, the new queen who was married to his uncle. These tragedies finally forced Hamlet to make his decision, and stabbed the sword of revenge to his uncle. Unfortunately, Hamlet was already hurt by a sword with poison on it and would be dead quickly at the moment. It was the kindness and hesitation made him fail. For his father, died while having a grasping dream and went to hell for that. Hamlet didn’t kill his uncle while he was praying because if he killed him at that time, he would have gone to heaven. Hamlet didn’t want to return good for evil, this irresolute nature caused the failure of his revenge. But why would god send a person to heaven or hell only considering what he’s thinking about at the last moment of life? Is that really fair? There is no doubt that Hamlet lived in a period of time that everybody was “crazy” and everybody except Hamlet was unaware of the truth. Hamlet even had to fake madness to prevent others from having suspicion. So why being sober when everybody else is drunk? Why being normal when everybody else is mad? It’s to keep your soul clear from being stained, it’s to stop cheating yourself when the truth is already out. It’s worthwhile to die for bringing out the truth, cause living with the concealed truth is worse than dying, especially when the truth that everyone should see is buried with your own hands. “To die - to sleep! But in that sleep of death what dreams may come”， who knows? The heaven loss of life in the play brought us shock, and in a short while, kept us from making the same mistake. But even this does not last too long. Time flies, but even flying time can not stop us from making the tragedy happens again and again. Instead, time took the sadness and regret away, weakened the memory. No more left but the sad touching story and the melody from fair Ophelia when she drowned in running stream. It’s not just a play, it’s something that is happening on the earth every moment. People never learn, soon the laughter and cheers may replace the lamentation, like the newborn roses covered the dead branches in spring. It’s the law of nature, living people continue living, death brings several days of weeping, but what remains? Nothing but dust and soil. This happened before, it’s happening now, but in the future （we hope） this shall never happen again.
篇5：哈姆雷特读后感英文
Were one to have the profound hatred, were one to avenge and harm his family who seems too far to harm, he would be either a hero or a monster. Should he fight the unbeatable foe and right the wrong, should he bear with unbearable sorrow, should he ruin himself in twisted enthusiasm, he would be Hamlet.
Among all the masterpieces of William Shakespeare, “Hamlet”， undoubtedly is worshipped and as one of the most successful and admired tragedies, while the character Hamlet remains one of the most loved dramatis personas in all-time history of literature.
To have read Shakespeare's “Romeo and Juliet” by the age of 16, I was moved to tears, while having no empathy with his another great one “Tempest”。 Presumably when I get 60 or older, I could be wise enough to understand the latter, but find it nothing worthwhile to go over the former one, where lays a romantic story that the only youngsters are addicted to. But it's a fact that whenever in our lifetime after gaining such experiences as getting through hard times, or, finding a real self, from “Hamlet”， we always find something that we consider as perpetuation, which is worth deep thoughts. This is because it highlights Hamlet's choices of life, choices made under certain circumstances of history and society, requested by the fate extraordinary to Hamlet himself, but ordinary to mankind. That is, to some extent, his experiences make a similar one to ours and, his destiny is something we're facing sometime in our own lives.
We're possibly the same. We explore the truth in the dark. We discover facts from the mist. We lose ourselves in determinations. We trespass on which we're forbid to be, hesitates at love and hatred, and struggle to rebuild system of values and spiritual prop in a world without standards and scales of standards.
Hamlet couldn't have been perfect. He is very much a person motivated by irrational enthusiasm, impetuous enough to kill Polonius only to find it's a mistake as the victim is not the king. But somehow it is for his poor enthusiasm, his weakness of humanity, that Hamlet touches countless readers, as everyone makes out himself from the ill-fated prince.
Hamlet's “revenge” isn't so much simply the killing of Claudius, as it is the purging of all the rottenness in the Danish court. And although it costs him his life, he succeeds.
At some time, we all consider how much wrong there is in the world. “Hamlet” gives us a chance to watch an ordinary person consciously choose to say “No!” to the world's wrongness and falsities, and to strike back with power. William Shakespeare held up the mirror to something in us that is precious.
I hear Hamlet thinking, “Too many people waste too much effort doing things that are not worthwhile. It's a bad world, and I am far from a perfect human being. We all end up dead in the end. So I am going to do something worthwhile, and do it right.”()
I hear him wondering, “What is a man, If his chief good and market of his time. Is but to sleep and feed? A beast, no more.”
I hear him whispering “To be, or not to be, aye, there's the point. To die, to sleep, is that all? Aye, all.”
That makes a hero to me, regardless of his blindness and madness which haunt everyone for a while in his time. Thousands of readers may have thousands of their own Hamlet, but there's something that stays the same, that Hamlet dares to run, where the brave dare not go. That's his quest.
Thinks about it.
篇6：哈姆雷特英文读后感
哈姆雷特英文读后感
The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark, or more simply Hamlet, is a tragedy by William Shakespeare, believed to have been written between 1599 and 1601. The play, set in Denmark, recounts how Prince Hamlet exacts revenge on his uncle Claudius, who has murdered Hamlet's father, the King, and then taken the throne and married Gertrude, Hamlet's mother. The play vividly charts the course of real and feigned madness―from overwhelming grief to seething rage―and explores themes of treachery, revenge, in-ce-st, and moral corruption.Despite much literary detective work, the exact year of writing remains in dispute. Three different early versions of the play have survived: these are known as the First Quarto (Q1), the Second Quarto (Q2) and the First Folio (F1). Each has lines, and even scenes, that are missing from the others. Shakespeare probably based Hamlet on the legend of Amleth, preserved by 13th-century chronicler Saxo Grammaticus in his Gesta Danorum and subsequently retold by 16th-century scholar Fran??ois de Belleforest, and a supposedly lost Elizabethan play known today as the Ur-Hamlet.
Given the play's dramatic structure and depth of characterization, Hamlet can be analyzed, interpreted and argued about from many perspectives. For example, scholars have debated for centuries about Hamlet's hesitation in killing his uncle. Some see it as a plot device to prolong the action, and others see it as the result of pressure exerted by the complex philosophical and ethical issues that surround cold-blooded murder, calculated revenge and thwarted desire. More recently, psychoanalytic critics have examined Hamlet's unconscious desires, and feminist critics have re-evaluated and rehabilitated the often maligned characters of Ophelia and Gertrude.
Hamlet is Shakespeare's longest play and among the most powerful and influential tragedies in the English language. It provides a storyline capable of “seemingly endleretelling and adaptation by others”. During Shakespeare's lifetime, the play was one of his most popular works, and it still ranks high among his most-performed, topping, for example, the Royal Shakespeare Company's list since 1879. It has inspired writers from Goethe and Dickens to Joyce and Murdoch and has been described as “the world's most filmed story after Cinderella”. The title role was almost certainly created for Richard Burbage, the leading tragedian of Shakespeare's time. In the four hundred years since, it has been played by highly acclaimed actors, and sometimes actresses, of each successive age.
“ Hamlet ” of Shakespear is a classical representative work. This book certainly does not have the big difference in the superficial plot with the historical fable, spoke or the Danish prince the story which revenged for the father, in which fills the rank smell of blood violence and dies.Just like the dramatis personae Horatio said: “ you may hear to to rape massacre, the unusual repair behavior, the dark center decision, accidental slaughter, borrows the hand murder , as well as falls into suicide result.” Windingly elects the plot, tightly centers on the revenge to launch. Hamlet Wittenberg hurries back the home in a hurry from Germany, is attends his father's funeral, enables him to accept, he not catches up with father's funeral, actually witnessed the mother and the Uncle Claudius' wedding ceremony, this had caused Hamm the Wright suspicion at the heart, added night above meets in the royal palace castle with father's ghost, the ghost sorrow sued, this pile atrocity was Uncle Hamlet the behavior, and wanted him to revenge for the father.To this, he started the difficult revenge course, launched the life and death contest with Claudius. Finally, sent out sword the revenge to Claudius
Hamlet is a man with contradictory,he had many chances to kill Claudius,but he hesitated,which reflects the religious thought poisons。
篇7：哈姆雷特英文读后感
哈姆雷特英文读后感
Hamlet “ of Shakespear is a classical representative work. This book certainly does not have the big difference in the superficial plot with the historical fable,spoke or the Danish prince the story which revenged for the father,in which fills the rank smell of blood violence and dies.Just like the dramatis personae Horatio said:” you may hear to to rape massacre,the unusual repair behavior,the dark center decision,accidental slaughter,borrows the hand murder , as well as falls into suicide result.“
Windingly elects the plot,tightly centers on the revenge to launch. Hamlet Wittenberg hurries back the home in a hurry from Germany,is attends his father's funeral,enables him to accept,he not catches up with father's funeral,actually witnessed the mother and the Uncle Claudius' wedding ceremony， this had caused Hamm the Wright suspicion at the heart,added night above meets in the royal palace castle with father's ghost, the ghost sorrow sued, this pile atrocity was Uncle Hamlet the behavior,and wanted him to revenge for the father.To this, he started the difficult revenge course,launched the life and death contest with Claudius.Finally,sent out sword the revenge to Claudius
Hamlet is a man with contradictory,he had many chances to kill Claudius,but he hesitated,which reflects the religious thought poisons.
篇8：哈姆雷特读后感英文作文
哈姆雷特读后感英文作文
Shakspere (wrong spelling) created Hamlet--a man with wisdom and courage 。In order to revenge on his uncle for killing his father， he pretented (spelling mistake) to be mad and suffered a series of misery。 On the contrary， we can also say that Hamlet is rude and selfish for he did not think twice before his revenge 。 if (Capitalize ”If“ since it is the beginning word of the sentence。) a country has no king， how can a country keep alive (You need a question mark here since it is a question。) So， every thing has two sides， the bright side and adumbral side。 Every time we make a decision we have to think twice。
Comment:
Be careful with your spelling， grammar， and punctuation。 Too many uncessary mistakes。
It is good that you looked at both the dark and bright sides of Hamlet。 Thats quite objective and convincing。
篇9：书虫哈姆雷特英文读后感
书虫哈姆雷特英文读后感
Shakspere (wrong spelling) created Hamlet--a man with wisdom and courage .In order to revenge on his uncle for killing his father, he pretented (spelling mistake) to be mad and suffered a series of misery. On the contrary, we can also say that Hamlet is rude and selfish for he did not think twice before his revenge . if (Capitalize ”If“ since it is the beginning word of the sentence.) a country has no king, how can a country keep alive (You need a question mark here since it is a question.) So, every thing has two sides, the bright side and adumbral side. Every time we make a decision we have to think twice.
Comment:
Be careful with your spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Too many uncessary mistakes.
It is good that you looked at both the dark and bright sides of Hamlet. Thats quite objective and convincing.
篇10：《哈姆雷特》英文读书笔记
《哈姆雷特》英文读书笔记
Shakspere (wrong spelling) created Hamlet--a man with wisdom and courage ，In order to revenge on his uncle for killing his father， he pretented (spelling mistake) to be mad and suffered a series of misery。 On the contrary， we can also say that Hamlet is rude and selfish for he did not think twice before his revenge 。 if (Capitalize ”If\" since it is the beginning word of the sentence，
) a country has no king， how can a country keep alive (You need a question mark here since it is a question。) So， every thing has two sides， the bright side and adumbral side。 Every time we make a decision we have to think twice。
Comment：
Be careful with your spelling， grammar， and punctuation。 Too many uncessary mistakes。
It is good that you looked at both the dark and bright sides of Hamlet。 Thats quite objective and convincing。
篇11： 《哈姆雷特》读后感
他是莎士比亚笔下的一位传奇人物，他是丹麦的一位王子，他是世界文学史上一个经典形象，他就是哈姆雷特。读莎士比亚的《哈姆莱特》，感受到的是杯具的美丽与伟大，莎士比亚所塑造的每个人物每一幕都那么每句话都有着戏剧的崇高。
《哈姆雷特》是莎士比亚杯具中的代表作品，这个剧本整整被推崇了几个世纪。它突出地反映了作者的人文主义思想，是一个时代的缩影。就是此刻，我们依然能够感觉到它的震撼人心。而这震撼不只来源于情节，也不仅仅仅是出色的文学手法，更重要的是它所体现出来的问题。它在思想资料上到达了前所未有的深度和广度，深刻的揭示出封建末期社会的罪恶与本质特征，同时，它还提出了一个关于命运的问题。
哈姆雷特是文艺复兴时期人文主义者的理想人物。他是王子，按照传统，是王权的当然继承者。但是，他的完美前途被颠倒了的时代颠倒了。戏一开头，作者就展现了一幅丑恶的社会画面：国家发生宫廷政变，国王被害，阴谋家窃取了王位；王后改嫁；满朝臣子趋炎附势等等。世界仿佛到了末日。于是这个王子发出了复仇的吼声。人们强烈地感受到这是“时代的灵魂”本身在呼喊。哈姆雷特本是个正直、乐观、有理想的青年，在正常的环境下，他能够成为一位贤明君主；但是现实的社会迫使他不得不装疯卖傻，进行复仇。他是英国那个特定的动荡不安时代的产物。
哈姆雷特是一个英雄形象，他很有心计，在敌强我弱的恶劣状况下，他敢于针锋相对地进行斗争，他击破了奸王设下的―个个圈套，在每一回合的斗争中，哈姆雷特都显得形象高大。但哈姆雷特决非“完人”，他虽然善于思索，却优柔寡断；他虽然受到人民的爱戴，却并不坚信人民。尽管哈姆雷特有令人钦佩的才能，竭力想除旧布新，但他总是郁郁不乐，迟疑不决，他始终是孤立的。这就注定了他与丑恶同归于尽的悲惨命运。他是一个巨人型的杯具。
哈姆雷特的死，是一场杯具，却也是对他最好的结果。当将命运的枷锁揭开了，他的职责也就应是放下了。生存在这个世界上对于哈姆雷特，失去了任何的好处。
莎士比亚的哈姆雷特，他的形象经典，不仅仅在于塑造了一个为父报仇的英雄式形象，更是正因他的英雄行为下的懦弱，他是一个传统好处下的一个大的突破。在一个痛苦的转变过程中，哈姆雷特从一个孩子成长为一个英勇的战士，这个过程也是我们每一个人都务必经历过的，因此每个人身上都有哈姆雷特的影子，他的形象也就更加引起我们的关注。
这部戏剧突出了人与人之间的仇恨，对金钱、权利的欲望。对于哈姆雷特的死，是很悲痛中也引起了我们一些思考。莎士比亚不属于一个时代而属于全世纪，他的戏剧就象灿烂星空中的北斗，永远为人们指引着方向。
篇12：哈姆雷特读后感
在西方戏剧史上，莎士比亚绝对算得上一个举足轻重的人物。《哈姆雷特》是他的最具代表性的作品。在《哈姆雷特》中，有很多能让人引起思考的地方，也有很多值得我们去细细咀嚼、体会的地方。作为一个女性，我自然是对浪漫的感情故事最感兴趣，所以，今日我想就剧中哈姆雷特与欧菲利亚的感情问题来发表一点我浅薄的看法。
在文中，欧菲利亚第一次在剧中出现，是在第一幕的第三景，她送雷尔提回到法国的时候。从雷尔提对欧菲利亚说：“至于哈姆雷特对你之兴趣那只是年轻人之暂时热度......”从雷尔提的这番话中，我们能够得知，哈姆雷特在这之前就已经对欧菲利亚表达过自我的爱慕之情。
而在剧本演到那里之时，哈姆雷特还没有去与鬼魂会面，所以说，他这时还不明白他父亲死亡的真相，也还没有制定他的复仇计划，所以，这时候，他对欧菲利亚是没有任何理由去产生利用或是报复的想法的，他对欧菲利亚，就是一个青年人对心爱女子正常的迷恋与爱慕。
剧本之后往下看，应对雷尔提对欧菲利亚的警告，欧菲利亚有点不甘心的问：“仅是如此而已？”她的问话中，透露着一丝小女生的那种听到别人说自我情人不好的时候的不舒服的心理。恋爱中的女孩子都会觉得自我的情人是完美无双的，并且相信对方对自我是真心实意。所以，当雷尔提对欧菲利亚说哈姆雷特对她只是年轻人的暂时兴趣，不是真正的爱的时候，她才会不甘心的反问那一句：“仅是如此而已？”
并且，在波隆尼尔对欧菲利亚说哈姆雷特给她的感情是虚伪的时候，欧菲利亚惊讶的辩解：“可是，父亲，他是有诚意的在追求我......他也曾郑重的对天发誓过......”但她的想法立刻就被波隆尼尔反驳了。欧菲利亚十分尊重她的父亲，所以也没有继续跟她父亲争论这件事了。所以，能够看出，欧菲利亚也是爱着哈姆雷特的。
可是这份感情并没有得到世俗的支持。欧菲利亚的父亲波隆尼尔和哥哥雷尔提都认为哈姆雷特只是在玩弄欧菲利亚的感情，所以一致让她离哈姆雷特远一点。哥哥和父亲都是家庭中很有地位和尊严的人，对于他们的指令，欧菲利亚不得不服从，只能对哈姆雷特冷待，和他坚持必须的距离。
接下来的情节，就是哈姆雷特得知父亲死亡的真相，决定要复仇了。很巧的是，哈姆雷特装疯的第一个对象，就是欧菲利亚。
欧菲利亚发现哈姆雷特不对劲，第一时间就是告诉自我最尊敬信赖的父亲波隆尼尔，她在剧中是这么说的：“他用力的扭住了我的手腕，排我于一臂之距......目不转睛的盯着我的脸，好像想画它一般......然后悲惨的深叹了一口气，就好像想在一口气中叹出他的胴体及生命一般......出门也不看路，因为他的眼睛一向不停地瞅着我呢。”从这段话中哈姆雷特的表现中能够看出，他在应对欧菲利亚的时候是饱含深情的。哈姆雷特的那一声长叹，在我看来，也是他对和欧菲利亚之间的感情的终结的遗憾和不舍吧。因为复仇，他不得不舍弃对欧菲利亚的深情，心中难免有苦痛与遗憾，所以才会在哈姆雷特离开欧菲利亚的时候，他的眼光却一刻也没有离开过她，想把她深深地记在脑海中。
但哈姆雷特还是深深的伤害了美丽的欧菲莉亚的心。在第三幕的第一景中，欧菲利亚想要退回哈姆雷特曾送给她的礼物，她说：“尊贵的殿下，你明白你以往有过，并且当时还添加了你的香甜蜜语，使它格外珍贵，此刻既然此芳已散，您就收回这些吧，对有情人来说送礼者若无诚，那此礼就会失去意义......”以往格外珍贵的礼物到此刻却失去了意义，不正是暗含了欧菲利亚对哈姆雷特态度的转变吗？从分外珍惜到心灰意冷。感情，永远都不能参染任何一丝杂质。
在他们俩接下来的对话中，哈姆雷特一遍又一遍让欧菲利亚去尼姑庵，着深深的刺痛了欧菲利亚的心，但换在哈姆雷特的角度来看，这又何尝不是一种保护欧菲利亚的做法呢？
哈姆莱特之所以呼喊，叫奥菲利亚去尼姑庵，并不是他发疯，也不是他对奥菲利亚的无情，而更是他对心上人的深爱。
当哈姆雷特经过鬼魂，得知父亲死亡真相时，他就再也无心沉溺于儿女情长了，于是他开始装疯，说看似糊涂的话。我认为他的目的之一就是为了保护奥菲利娅，他不想让奥菲利娅牵扯进这场复仇行动，他想独自去应对一切。于是他数次斥责奥菲利亚：“进尼姑庵去吧”，在我看来，他认为尼姑庵远离尘世、远离荒淫与罪恶，是这个世界最终一块净土。经过父亲的死他看到了世界的肮脏，人性的残忍，他实在不想看到美丽纯洁的奥菲利亚也变得像他母亲那样，所以他叫圣洁的欧菲利亚去尼姑庵，也就是不想欧菲利亚被现实的污垢所污染。
但这个时候，欧菲利亚的心已经被彻底伤透了，她对感情最完美的幻想都已经终结。剧情发展到后面，哈姆雷特无意刺死欧菲利亚父亲波隆尼尔这件事成了压死骆驼的最终一根稻草。一边是尊敬信任的父亲，一边是心心念念的爱人，在重大的精神压力之下，欧菲利亚真的疯掉了。
在欧菲利亚疯掉不久之后，她就坠河而死了，但她到底是自杀还是不慎落水还不得而知。在欧菲利亚葬礼的时候，哈姆雷特回来了。看着心爱人的尸体，哈姆雷特悲痛万分，对着欧菲利亚的哥哥雷尔提最终说出来内心最真实的话：“我爱欧菲利亚，四万个兄弟之爱加起来也不足我所给予她的爱。”这是文章中最明确的提现哈姆雷特对欧菲利亚感情的地方。
哈姆雷特与欧菲利亚虽然互相爱慕，但由于国仇家恨等等原因而不能在一齐，最终酿成了杯具，实在是可怜可叹。
篇13：哈姆雷特读后感
接触到《哈姆雷特》这部伟大的作品，要追溯到初三时学的一篇《威尼斯商人》的课文，当时自我就赞叹于莎士比亚对人物的刻画和对台词的精工细硺，而从这篇课文了解到的《哈姆雷特》，更是将这两点体现得淋漓尽致。这本书引人深思发人深省，接下来我便谈一谈我对这部作品的看法。
从情节上讲，《哈姆雷特》的情节构造很简洁，篡位、乱伦、毒杀、阴谋杂糅交织在一齐，就我而言，看过太多网络写手的各类小说以后，觉得这部戏剧的判，邪不胜正等等。我认为这部作品情节上最大的亮点在于情节的讽刺性，无情节委实算不上罕见，且主题也贴合许多那个时代的主旋律：对人性的思考与批论是丧礼之后立即举办的婚礼，还是害人不成反害了自我（比如王后喝下的为哈姆雷特准备的毒酒）等等，无不在讽刺人性的丑恶。整个剧本是以鬼魂出现告诉哈姆雷特真相为开端，伯格涅斯等人的死以及哈姆雷特装疯策划戏中戏为发展，哈姆雷特与雷欧提斯比剑为高潮，最终哈姆雷特复仇身死结局，带有些玄幻色彩，读完后令人扼腕叹息的同时，又着实欣慰于还有霍拉旭向世人昭告真相，主题鲜明且资料充实。
俗话说：“一千个人眼中，就有一千个哈姆雷特。”我心中的哈姆雷特，是一个嫉恶如仇敢爱敢恨的虔诚之士，然而却无辜的遭遇父亲被害、叔父夺权、母亲改嫁的接连变故，得知真相后的他彷徨绝望却又复仇心切，然而他的实力却实在难以支持他的心愿，为了复仇他甚至利用了母亲对他的维护与宠爱帮他掩饰杀害伯格涅斯的真相，甚至不惜牺牲自我和奥菲利亚的感情去装疯套取真相，最终大仇得报却也搭上了自我和母亲的生命。他为正义而死，死的伟大却又让人悲悯叹息；他尽管复仇心切却从未动用失控的暴力；他心狠果断，为了复仇抛弃奥菲利亚并用言语中伤她；他屈服于命运却又心存不甘……能够说，哈姆雷特无疑是矛盾的，可是正因为这种矛盾，他感悟出“生存还是毁灭”这样的人生命题，能够在最终关头勇敢地孤注一掷。但同时哈姆雷特也给我留下了许多谜题，比如剧本中间哈姆雷特到底是装疯还是真疯——因为我觉得在那种复仇心切充满焦虑却又无能为力的时候精神紊乱是很正常的——再比如哈姆雷特和奥菲利亚的感情是否真的存在——如果说在一切事故没有发生之前单纯善良的哈姆雷特还没有被改变的时候他就已经向奥菲利亚表白了可能他确实对她有感情，可是之后他又能够为了复仇抛弃奥菲利亚甚至说了说“我以往喜欢过你”
“我从没喜欢过你”这种话，然而得知奥菲利亚死讯时又失态不惜暴露自我，可是又没有表现出剩余的悲伤（也许是莎士比亚先生在这方面下的笔墨不多）——因而话题只好又回到他的矛盾上。我期望随着我阅历的增长，再有机会重读这本书时，能够体会到更深的层次。
最终是这部剧本的语言，尽管语言的优美犀利动人有很大部分是译者的功劳，可是语言中反馈出的深刻思想却又是莎士比亚本人的。整部作品中令我有感触的句子有很多，最经典的当属“生存还是毁灭，这是一个值得研究的问题；默然忍受命运的暴虐的毒箭，或是挺身反抗人世间的无涯的苦难，经过斗争把它们扫清，这两种行为，哪一种更高贵？死了；睡着了；什么都完了；……人们甘心久困于患难之中，也就是为了这个缘故；谁愿意忍受人世的鞭挞和讥嘲、压迫者的凌辱、傲慢者的冷眼、被轻蔑的感情的惨痛、法律的迁延、官吏的横暴和费尽辛勤所换来的小人的鄙视，要是他只要用一柄小小的刀子，就能够清算他自已的一生？谁愿意负着这样的重担，在烦劳的生命的压迫下呻吟流汗，倘不是因为惧怕不可知的死后，是它迷惑了我们的意志，使我们宁愿忍受目前的磨折，不敢向我们所不明白的痛苦飞去？这样，重重的顾虑使我们全变成了懦夫，决心的赤热的光彩，被审慎的思维盖上了一层灰色，伟大的事业在这一种研究之下，也会逆流而退，失去了行动的意义。”这一段，起初我看到第一句话时，体悟到的内涵虽说大体相同，可是语言绝没有这般全面与振聋发聩，整部作品的魅力也都被这些经典优美的台词展现，令人心醉于主角坎坷的经历。
看完一本《哈姆雷特》，感慨良多，却只能用这一点浅陋的笔墨传达我的赞颂。有机会我必须更加细致的研读这部经典，争取温故而知新。
篇14：哈姆雷特读后感
而有人说，一千个人眼里有一千个哈姆雷特。因为每个人的背景，成长经历，环境不一样，造就的性格，价值观等也存在种种差异，我们在看故事时容易无意识将自我反射于主角身上。并且哈姆雷特这个主角的性格细腻而复杂，有着太多的人类共性，所以不一样的行为在不一样的人眼中会有不一样的理解，所以才说一千个人眼中有一千个哈姆雷特。
哈姆雷特中有许多经典的台词，比如，生存还是毁灭，这是一个问题，这句台词流传千古，是哈姆雷特王子发现叔叔和母亲害死了自我的父亲，两个人奸情的时候，他痛苦并且对自我的人生产生了怀疑，他不明白是该继续生存下去还是自杀，读后感.他无法应对生活带来的痛苦，可是对死亡的恐惧也压在心头。他是该默然忍受命运暴虐的毒箭，还是挺身反抗人世无涯的痛苦呢？这句话包含着他当时内心的矛盾不安与痛苦难耐。像这样经典的台词在文中还有很多很多。‘’脆弱啊，你的名字是女人”，“葬礼中剩下的残羹冷炙，正好宴请婚宴上的宾客”。
《哈姆雷特》作为古代西方的名作，不仅仅留下了经典的台词，人物更是反映了十六世纪末和十七世纪初的英国社会的现实。当时的社会混乱，新兴资产阶级和封建贵族进行权利的争夺，经过文章，莎士比亚批判了封建势力的罪恶行径。当时也正处于文艺复兴时期，虽然人们对于人的概念更加重视，但随之而来的也是私欲横流。正是这样的社会背景产生了这样的《哈姆雷特》。
篇15：哈姆雷特读后感
看到《哈姆雷特》这本书的名字，给我的感觉是这本书应当是描述一个人的。我曾也听过身边的人提过这一本书，这是一个伟大的杯具，我是带着好奇心，去看着一本书。
起初，我刚开始看的时候，因为人物不熟悉，并且人物也不少，我是有些看得不是很明白其中的关系。之后看着看着，也搞清楚其中的人物关系了。《哈姆雷特》算是我第一本看得剧本，看起来很明了，人物之间的对话等等。
基本上描述的是这样的故事：哈姆雷特的父亲前任国王死了，母亲改嫁现任国王，哈姆雷特父亲的弟弟，哈姆雷特眼里，这是不正当的，是乱伦的，罪恶的事情。由于父亲的死，给哈姆雷特很大的打击，以至于之后遇见鬼魂，开始复仇计划。让鬼魂用他的身体，而他自我则精神颓唐，为了不让国王发现异常，就装疯卖傻，并告诉自我的好朋友霍拉旭要保密。
其中爱上了一位女孩奥菲利亚，并也巧妙地利用这个原因，掩盖了他的装疯卖傻，让国王认为是因为哈姆雷特父亲的死和感情上的打击导致哈姆雷特的行为怪异。可是，哈姆雷特最终是真的爱上了这个女孩。因为哈姆雷特很爱戴他的父亲，所以在他死后，明白他死是因为国王谋杀的。整日被仇恨围着，总是想着怎样复仇。
本来哈姆雷特还是有一些怀疑的，之后因为宫里来了戏班子，哈姆雷特就趁这个机会试探一下国王。吩咐准备的一出戏是讲发生在维也纳的一件谋杀公爵的案件。观察国王面色不自然，装着身体不适的样貌，离开了。这时，哈姆雷特确定了不是他自我的幻想，而是真的是国王杀死了自我的父亲，还和母亲结婚！正当哈姆雷特想着怎样报仇的时候，王后召见他说话，哈姆雷特觉得是个机会，就去盘问王后，国王怕王后偏袒儿子，便让奥菲利亚的父亲躲在暗处。
之后在这过程中，哈姆雷特错手杀死了他。他指出了王后的罪责，也恳求王后对上帝承认过去的罪孽，离开国王。要是王后以真正的母亲的样貌来对待他，那他也会以真正的儿子的态度来祈求上苍保佑她。王后最终感动了，答应照他说的去做。本来国王能够哈姆雷特杀死波洛涅斯这个借口去杀死哈姆雷特，可是研究到那些爱戴哈姆雷特的子民们，还有王后的阻挠，便没有傻死哈姆雷特，就放流放了。
从中国王安排人在这途中杀死哈姆雷特，哈姆雷特也明白其中肯定有鬼，就巧妙地扭转局势。可是还是被海盗俘虏了。可是海盗们对他很尊敬，放了他期望他能在朝里说些好话。哈姆雷特回到王城，明白他心爱的女孩死了，很是悲痛。因为看见心爱女孩的哥哥跳坟，悲痛的哈姆雷特忍不住跳了出来，因为哈姆雷特杀死了他的父亲，所以痛恨哈姆雷特，狠毒的国王便利用这一点来杀害哈姆雷特。
让雷欧提斯让他使用一把涂了致命毒药的开刃尖头剑来和哈姆雷特比剑。起初，雷欧提斯心存犹豫，认为自我的良心不让自我这样做（剑刺哈姆雷特），前两回合都让哈姆雷特胜利，最终一回合以为和哈姆雷特的挑衅，仇恨的心复燃了，就刺伤了哈姆雷特。在这期间，因王后误喝了国王为哈姆雷特准备的毒饮料，哈姆雷特便明白了这是国王的阴谋。
而快死的雷欧提斯，把所有的事情告诉了哈姆雷特的好朋友霍拉旭，之后，雷欧提斯死了，哈姆雷特也明白自我快不行了，就杀死了国王。奄奄一息的哈姆雷特用最终一口气要求亲眼目睹这场杯具的好朋友霍拉旭必须要坚强地活下去要他把全部秘密公诸于众。当霍拉旭含着眼泪答应他必须忠实地这样做时，哈姆雷特便死了。
正在这时，远征波兰的挪威王子福丁布拉斯到达宫殿，霍拉旭和其余人都流着泪祈祷天使保佑王子的灵魂。大家都觉得，要是哈姆雷特没死的话，他必须会成为一个最尊贵、最得人心、最仁慈、宽厚的丹麦国王。
从这故事能够看出莎士比亚把故事写得曲折且吸引人，各种阴谋等等的。经过哈姆雷特父亲的死因和鬼魂来描述哈姆雷特的复仇计划和过程。在莎士比亚笔下的哈姆雷特，很矛盾的，很忧郁的，明明完好的父亲却被阴谋害死，明明深爱的女孩，却因为自我的报仇，而失去了心爱的女孩。
哈姆雷特给我的感觉，就是挣扎在现实与仇恨之间，读起来心里也是从满苦涩，莎士比亚把哈姆雷特描述的很直白，完完全全的体现出一个忧郁的哈姆雷特！整一个故事，从鬼魂、装疯卖傻、失去感情、试探国王、误杀大臣、被流放，到最终的决斗，故事曲折，激动人心。
“生存还是毁灭，这是个问题”这句哈姆雷特感叹的话，从中能够看出哈姆雷特内心痛苦的挣扎。明明心里是善良的，不想这样，可是被命运控制着，被仇恨蒙蔽着，母亲改嫁与父亲弟弟，和父亲的死亡，给哈姆雷特很大的打击，最终感情的葬送，在这如此的大杯具中，还有这小杯具。
鬼魂，是一个很重要的线索，在开始时，设置了悬念，哈姆雷特的父亲究竟如何死的？以至于哈姆雷特的勇敢一面表现出来，鬼魂是哈姆雷特复仇的很重要的线索。而奥菲利亚，这一人物更添了哈姆雷特心中的悲痛，感情的葬送，雷欧提斯，没有这一人物，最终的结局也就不是这样了，也起了很重要的的作用，而哈姆雷特的好朋友烘托剧情，是唯一在这个杯具中存活的人。
最终，其中，有一个人物挪威王子，在剧中仅有短短过场戏。他的重要性在于，由他说出全剧的最终台词，似乎象征一个更为光明的未来，阐述了剧作主题。
